|
|
SUDAN: NGO expresses concern for neglected "lost girls"
NAIROBI, 13 Feb 2002 (IRIN) - The nongovernmental
organisation Refugees International on Tuesday expressed concern
that the US refugee resettlement programme for the so-called "lost
boys of Sudan" had not been matched by an equal effort on behalf of
Sudanese refugee girls by the UN refugee agency and the US
administration.
The NGO said the rationale given for what it
called the "neglect" of the girls was that "since these girls had
been placed in Sudanese homes, they must be assimilating smoothly
into the community". However, it contended that life for many of the
fostered girls was difficult, with many used as domestic servants
and prevented from attending school.
"Those who do attend
miss many days a month, because they have to gather wood and water,
or participate in food distributions [in the camp]," Refugees
International added.
Perhaps more importantly, it suggested,
girls bring the possibility of a bride price [the money or property
brought by a man to his bride, or bride's family, at marriage] to
foster parents, and this had regularly led to the de facto abduction
of girls placed with foster families.
The Sudanese minors who
constitute the so-called lost boys and girls arrived in Kakuma
Refugee Camp in northwestern Kenya between 1992 and 1994, having
first fled the Sudanese civil war to Ethiopia in 1987, and having
again been targeted and chased from there in 1991, according to the
NGO. They originally numbered between 17,000 and 25,000, but fewer
than 11,000 arrived in Kakuma, it said.
Since 2000, with
their designation as "a priority caseload" for refugee resettlement
in the US, that country had received 3,276 Sudanese boys from this
group, but only 89 girls, Refugee International stated.
It
said the "lost girls" had experienced many of the same traumatic
experiences as the boys - losing their parents, siblings and homes -
but culturally could not be grouped to live by themselves - as the
boys could - and were instead taken into the households of members
of their communities, mostly from the same clans.
"We girls
were not put into groups like the boys. If we had been put into
groups, we might have been attacked. We are now in the community,
and nobody knows where we are," Refugees International quoted one of
the girls in Kakuma as saying.
"The reality is that these
lost girls have been forgotten twice - upon arrival at Kakuma
Refugee Camp, and again when the US refugee resettlement programme
was started," according to Refugees International.
The US and
the UN refugee agency still had the opportunity to make the
resettlement programme more available to girls - as well as boys -
who had endured untold atrocities, and to give them a new start in a
third country, it said. "We must not let these 'lost girls' be
forgotten a third time," it added.
The Sudanese refugee
girls, when they first arrived in Kakuma, represented only a small
number of the youths concerned, but they had their cases heard,
after which many were placed in foster homes in what was considered
a culturally appropriate move, according to an official from the UN
refugee agency.
In terms of numbers, the vast majority of the
youths were boys, and the resettlement of only 89 girls - compared
to 3,276 boys - had to be seen in proportional terms, the official
told IRIN.
More boys than girls were chosen for the
resettlement programme at least partly because they were "more
visible" on their arrival in Kakuma, according to other humanitarian
sources. While the boys were living in "group care" situations, and
were easily identifiable within the general camp population, it was
culturally unacceptable for the girls to be grouped together.
The girls were generally fostered within the community, and
were therefore harder for the office of the UN High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR) to isolate and address, especially where foster
families chose to keep them from the best-interest determination
process in the hope of getting bride price when the girls married,
officials added.
There was now a greater interest in getting
the girls resettled - not least from the US government - but it was
still important to establish and sustain greater momentum to this
end, sources told IRIN.
In the short term, there were
perhaps between 500 and 1,000-plus "lost girls" in Kakuma from the
original 1992 caseload from Ethiopia - some over 18 years old,
unmarried and still in foster care; but there were also "a lot more
who arrived more recently, and may be in equally difficult personal
situations, that should also be considered and have their cases [for
resettlement] considered", the sources added.
In that light,
Refugees International has recommended that the US government and
UNHCR work together to conduct "best-interest" interviews with
refugees to determine the cases to be resettled in the US, "with
emphasis on finding the most needy, but with particular emphasis on
unaccompanied females".
This process should he hastened so
that more girls were not married off for bride price while their
cases were being heard, it said.
The "lost girls" had been
neglected, "and the time has come to redress this injustice",
Refugees International added.
[ENDS]
|
|