RECORD OF THE
LILIIR
PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE
PEACE CONFERENCE
EAST BANK
CONFERENCE
FOR
PEACE AND
RECONCILIATION
BETWEEN THE
ANYUAK, DINKA,
JIE, KACHIPO, MURLE AND NUER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LILIIR, UPPER NILE, SUDAN
9TH TO THE 15TH OF MAY
------------------------------------------
Introduction &
Background
The Liliir Conference marked an important
step in the progressive people-to-peoples' movement for peace and
reconciliation among southern Sudanese ethnic groups. Its achievements must be understood in the context of earlier
peace initiatives conducted between various local groups, the most significant
being the Wunlit conference in March 1999 between the Dinka and the Nuer, who
reside on the west bank of the river Nile.
Since then, other notable achievements of the growing peace process have
occurred at the local level.
Under the facilitation of the New Sudan Council of Churches, the peace process is characterised by being people-led and people-focused, i.e. an encounter between the traditional and civil representatives of the participating ethnic groups independent from the political and military domain. This is perceived to be a critical element to the process: that it remains as free as possible from the interference of opportunistic political forces which, if unchecked, is capable of manipulating proceedings for self-seeking gains.
Encouraged
by the significance and powerful spirit generated at Wunlit (which concentrated
on the dominant Nilotic groups west of the Nile), the peace process advanced to
other areas and a momentum grew among people east of the river to convene a
second major conference to address their particular concerns.
The
challenges facing the Liliir conference were complex given the diversity of the
ethnic groups that reside in the region; the arrangement of its divided
political landscape; and the intense mistrust and conflict that has arisen as a
result. Throughout Sudan's civil war,
the traditional hostilities between many of these groups have often been
appropriated by warring parties for their political and military ends,
sometimes with devastating effects for the ethnic groups concerned.
While
the Liliir conference was attended by a large number of ethnic groups, it was
unable to assemble a full representation from the region. This was partly because of the distance and
logistics involved and partly because some participating delegates were
obstructed from attending (by their military commanders). The delegates deeply regretted that 10
Gawaar chiefs, and 6 Lou chiefs (both Nuer), while transiting to the
conference, were detained in Lankien and were unable to attend. Finally, the conference didn't have adequate
time (and resources) to conduct the number and range of more localised
encounters and reconciliations necessary to bring about a comprehensive,
region-wide settlement. Once the rain
season intensifies in Sudan (from the month of May), transport and logistics
become prohibitive for over 4 months.
However,
at the bequest of the people themselves, a significant and sufficient number of
groups declared their interest to meet in the spirit of the (now 1 year old)
Wunlit conference, and capture the desire of the people to talk of peace and
reconciliation. These groups were the
Anyuak form Akobo and Pochalla; the Bor and the Padang Dinka; the Jie and
Kachipo groups from the Boma area; the Lou and some Gawaar Nuer from Ayod, Waat
and Akobo; and finally the Murle from Boma.
The
box below gives a simple representation of the participating groups and their
approximate boundaries of interaction.
In varying degrees, conflict exists between
ethnic groups and within ethnic
groups, and not all the members of one group are necessarily perceived to be
hostile to another.
Thus,
for example, the conference distinguished between the Murle from Boma and the
Murle from Pibor, the latter residing in areas under northern government control
and seen as hostile to almost all neighbouring groups. Similarly, the Gawaar and the Lou Nuer were
distinguished, as there is currently discord between members of both
sub-groups.
Box depicting proximity of participating ethnic groups, to
each other.
It
was also acknowledged that prior to the conference, dialogue and smaller
localised agreements were either in process or actually brokered - principally
among the Bor Dinka and the Gawaar and Lou Nuer, and also among the Padang
Dinka and the Gawaar Nuer - reflecting the changing trends taking place at the
grassroots towards peace in southern Sudan among civilian groups.
In
order to consolidate these positive trends, NSCC deployed a team of mobilisers
and an elaborate network of consultations were set up. Although Wunlit recommended that the next
major conference be in the land of the Nuer, the organisers failed to obtain
agreement on a suitable site where security would be sufficiently
guaranteed. This regrettable situation was
a disappointment to all, and finally, Liliir was agreed as an alternative.
Organisation of the
Conference
The
host community prepared the conference facilities and NSCC provided
facilitation and technical support. An
additional water point was secured with assistance from the NGO community. Security was provided by the SPLA. Because of the relative distances between
the groups, airlifts had to be conducted for the visiting delegates. A number of observers also attended,
including elders from the diaspora (and other parts of Sudan), church leaders,
international representatives and the media.
The
occasion commenced with the traditional sacrifice of a white bull and the
conference followed a now proven procedure.
Firstly, beginning with the hosts, the delegates faced each other and
told their story of transgressions, hostility and violence against their
people. A period was then offered for
rebuttal, comments and observations.
This dialogue continued for three days and produced a catalogue of sensitive
but key issues upon which a peace agreement would be fashioned. In response, 9 working groups were
established to address the topics in more detail:
1. PROPOSED MECHANISMS FOR: I) THE IDENTIFICATION OF MISSING PERSONS; II) THE RETURN OF ABDUCTEES;
AND III) THE RECOGNITION OF MARRIAGES
2. PROPOSED MECHANISMS: TO ENSURE THE FREE
MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE
& THEIR ANIMALS, AND THE
PROVISION OF ACCESS TO ANIMAL WATER POINTS
AND GRAZING AREAS
3. PROPOSED MECHANISMS FOR: THE
IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON BORDERS
& THE ESTABLISHMENT OF BORDER
CHIEFS, POLICE, COURTS AND PATROLS
4. PROPOSED MECHANISM FOR: MONITORING THE
PEACE AGREEMENT GENERALLY
5. PROPOSED MECHANISMS: TO ENCOURAGE THE
RESOLUTION OF INTERNAL NUER
CONFLICTS IN THE FUTURE
6. PROPOSED MECHANISMS: TO CONSOLIDATE AND
DEVELOP THE RECONCILIATIONS BETWEEN
THE (GAWAAR) NUER AND PADANG & BOR DINKA
7. PROPOSED MECHANISMS: TO RESOLVE THE
TENSIONS BETWEEN THE LOU NUER
AND THE ANYUAK IN AKOBO
8. PROPOSED MEASURES: TO BRING ABOUT
DIALOGUE WITH THE PIBOR MURLE
9. PROPOSED MECHANISMS: TO SAFEGUARD THE
PEACE PROCESS
FROM
POLITICAL OPPORTUNISM AND TO ENCOURAGE THE PARTICIPATION OF THE REMAINING UPPER NILE GROUPS, TO
JOIN THE PROCESS
The
working groups reported back to the conference their proposed resolutions and
recommendations. After discussion, and
a number of amendments, they were finally approved by the delegates.
Reflecting
the substantive issues discussed, and in the spirit of reconciliation generated
by the process, a covenant was signed by 129 representatives. This formal act publicly sealed the
participants desire for peace and outlined the areas where they will take
responsibility for its implementation.
The ceremony was concluded with the sacrifice of a white ox. The Christian community, both those
attending the conference and those scattered throughout the world who are in
solidarity with the peace process, offered prayer for its success and the
advancement of peace and reconciliation throughout southern Sudan. The conference also expressed appreciation
to the many supporting governmental and non-governmental organisations that
have provided financial assistance to the peace process.
The
conference recognised and regretted that not all ethnic groups, or important
sub-groups, were represented on the day.
It was the wish of the delegates that, with the assistance of NSCC, the
process move forward to encompass these groups as soon as possible. Nevertheless, the Liliir conference stands
as a remarkable accomplishment. The
conference was successful in fortifying the voice of the southern Sudanese
people in their compelling demand for peace.
The delegates were unambiguous in appealing to their leaders (military,
civil and the educated class in general): that there must be unity and peace
amongst all the southern people, and more accountable administration and
governance of their interests and affairs.
However, the determination of the people to persevere with the
achievement of peace, regardless of what obstacles are encountered, was
apparent.
The
following attached documents testify to the achievements secured at Liliir,
namely;
• Liliir
Covenant Document
• Conference
Recommendations and Resolutions
• Press
Statement Released by NSCC
• Delegate
Signatures to the Covenant Agreement
This
document therefore represents the official publication of the Liliir agreement
and has been approved by members of the NSCC conference facilitation team:
__________________________ __________________________
Dr Haruun L. Ruun Mr
Telar Deng
__________________________ __________________________
Ms Iliana Nadi Albino Mr
Paul Murphy
*A more detailed
record of the conference will be made available by NSCC in the future.
MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE LILIIR CONFERENCE
9TH
TO THE 15TH OF MAY, 2000
Throughout
the proceedings, a number of motions were proposed by delegates of the
conference, passed by the assembly, and which are recorded below. In addition, the 9 working groups produced a
series of resolutions and recommendations which are intended to accompany the
general covenant agreement.
The following motions
were unanimously carried at the conference:
1. MOTION
THAT THE LILIIR CONFERENCE FULLY
ENDORSES THE WUNLIT WEST BANK PEACE
AND RECONCILIATION CONFERENCE, MARCH 1999.
2. MOTION
THAT THE LILIIR CONFERENCE CALLS FOR
A SPECIAL 'CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS'
TO OVERSEE THE RESOLUTION OF BORDER IDENTIFICATION AND THE REGULATION OF MOVEMENT
3. MOTION
THAT
THE LILIIR CONFERENCE CONDEMNS THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE UPDF IN DETAINING THE
AEROPLANE WITH THE CONFERENCE DELEGATES ON THE 11TH OF MAY.
The following
resolutions were approved by the conference:
4. RESOLUTION
TO
ENSURE I) IDENTIFICATION OF MISSING PERSONS; II) THE RETURN OF ABDUCTEES; AND III) THE RECOGNITION
OF (DE FACTO) MARRIAGES
• All
abducted women, together with their children (whether born in legitimate
wedlock or not), will be handed back to their biological parents and relatives
in the presence of the local civil and security authorities.
• For
parents who consent to the marriage of previously captive girls/women, that
their marriages will be fulfilled according to local norms after the handing
over procedure has taken place.
• The
local civil and security authorities in the areas cited below are to be charged
with the collection of the abuctees and to co-ordinate with the identification
of the missing persons through the regional Peace Council (see N° 7) and the
legitimate owners of the abducted children.
The process should be implemented between the relevant chiefs, under the
supervision of the Council. 11 areas
were identified with one or more chiefs who are to provide lists of the
abducted persons.
Contact
List:
i) Lou Nuer, Chief Char Reath Kok (Akobo)
Chief Peter
Pok Reath (Gon-Gat Bol)
Chief Dak
Nyop
ii) Gawaar Nuer, To be identified later.
iii) Anyuak, Chief
Akug Obang Obuala
Chief Opathi
Ghuara Jok
iv) Murle, Chief
Boya Girgir
v) Bor Gok, Chief Madhoor Alier Jongroor
vi) Bor Athool, Chief Ajak Mabior Deng
vii) Twic Ajuong, Chief Ayuel Warabek Ayuel
Chief Maketh
Arok Maketh
viii) Twic Lith Chief
Garang Deng Douth
Chief Kuir
Bul Ruaal
Chief Bior
Aguer
ix) Duk Payuel Chief Majok Chol Jok
x) Duk Padiet Chief Deng Mathiang Mabior
xi) Padang Chief
Majok Mabil Deng
5. RESOLUTION
TO ENSURE
THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE & THEIR ANIMALS AND THE PROVISION OF
ACCESS TO ANIMAL WATER POINTS AND GRAZING AREAS
The
conference favoured the setting up of a committee to oversee the issue of
access to common or shared resources, especially animal grazing and water
points, and how those rights can be protected.
• That
the functions of the committee will be given to a special Peace Council (and
its various sub-committees), recommended below (N° 7).
Representation should include; regional authorities, security, police,
local administration, veterinary services, health services, head chiefs, ethnic
group representatives.
• That
the grazing period be considered from January to June (people & cattle to be
dispersed by end of June).
• That
people and their cattle will be accompanied to their allocated grazing areas by
the border chiefs.
• That
the Peace Council will visit sites annually before allocating rights of access
to the head chiefs (and copied to the local authorities).
• That
a small police force at the grazing areas be established. Security forces shall be responsible for the
general security of the people and their cattle. Support for the security force shall come form the chiefs and
their people. Security forces shall
keep the Peace Committee informed of what the security status is, and what
actions they have already taken.
• That
the provision of clean water for the settled population and their animals be
part of the implementation plan.
6. RESOLUTION
TO
ENSURE THE IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON BORDERS & THE ESTABLISHMENT OF BORDER CHIEFS, POLICE, COURTS AND PATROLS
• That
border post police will control incursions by cattle rustlers, etc., and report
transgressions to their respective chiefs for prosecution.
• That
chiefs will meet from the border areas and that courts will be established
close to the border posts. Difficult
issues or cases will be reported to the higher authorities from the respective
areas.
• That
the police will be equipped with radios (13) for easy communication with their
counterparts in the region.
The
conference identified a number of common borders and recommended border
stations:
ANYUAK
- Murle: Pochalla
& Pibor
Border Station: Abich/Okello
- Murle: Pochalla
& Boma
Border Station: contested (Alal/Rad)
- Kachipo: Pochalla
& Dima
Border Station: Dima
AKOBO/ANYUAK
-Murle: Akobo &
Pibor
Border Station: Bim
- Nuer: Akobo &
Waat
Border Station: Duachen
MURLE
- Nuer: Pibor &
Akobo
Border Station: Nyandit
- Nuer: Pibor &
Waat
Border Station: Biem
- Dinka: Pibor &
Bor
Border Station: Langou (for Bor south)
Manawan (for Bor north)
DINKA BOR
- Nuer: Bor & Waat
Border Station: Ayuai
- Nuer: Bor and Ayod
Border Station: Chueithon
NUER WAAT
- Dinka Bor: Waat
& Bor
Border Station: Riek/Panyok
NUER AYOD
- Dinka Duk Padiet:
Ayod & Bor (North)
Border Station: Paloich
DINKA PADANG
- Nuer Lankien: Baliet
& Waat
Border Station: Kuel (Dinka) &
Nyirol (Nuer)
- Nuer Nassir: Baliet
& Nassir
Border Station: Nyayin
- Shilluk: Baliet
& Sobat
Border Station: Nyinibil
7. RESOLUTION
TO
ESTABLISH A REGIONAL PEACE COMMITTEE TO MONITOR AND SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PEACE AGREEMENT
Recommended that a Peace Council be
established with the sole purpose of overseeing and assisting the
implementation and strengthening of the Liliir Covenant and resolutions. Membership, it was suggested, should consist
of a chair and vice/chair; secretary; secretary for information and for
finance; chief and associate advisors; resource people and other members to be
identified. Each county/district will
have a sub-committee, and where appropriate, establsih them at the village
level.
It is also recommended that the
chiefs and civil institutions in each area make an explicit commitment to
support the peace process and Peace Council, and monitor its implementation.
The following
recommendations were agreed by the conference:
8. RECOMMENDATIONS
TO ENCOURAGE THE RESOLUTION OF
INTERNAL NUER CONFLICTS IN THE FUTURE
Recommended
that a meeting be called in the area where the conflict is reputed to be
occurring. In particular, a committee
should be formed to address the conflict between the Gawaar and the Lou Nuer,
and presided over by the chiefs of the neighbouring tribes, i.e. Dinka from
Bor, Bahr el Ghazal and western Nuer (to discuss root causes and reach a
peaceful solution). Ayod or Yuai were
suggested as possible locations.
The conference raised an appeal to
the liberation movements of the region to establish secure conditions in the
recommended areas, and assist the church in preparing the ground for such a
meeting. An appeal was also made to
NSCC to assist with facilitation, and to the chiefs to assist with security by
mobilising the communities for peace.
Recommended that this meeting take
place 'as soon as possible'. The Gawaar
and Lou chiefs who attended the Liliir process should be mandated to go and
inform their respective communities of the conference's covenant and
resolutions. It is viewed as essential
that these areas have (supervised and conditional) radio access. A practical but vital recommendation is to
address the critical lack of water in the areas of Ayod and Yuai, as part of
the process.
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
TO
CONSOLIDATE AND DEVELOP THE RECONCILIATION TAKING PLACE BETWEEN THE (GAWAAR) NUER AND PADANG & BOR DINKA
Recommended to form (joint)
committees at the local level with four members from each ethnic group
(suggesting a chief, a church leader, civil administrator and a member from a
woman's association). Groups that have
not attended Liliir should be given a record of the conference (e.g. Gawaar
Lak, Renk, Pariang, Atar, & Jikeny).
Appeal to NSCC to assist the joint
committee with transport for their task and essential commodities for peace
meetings. Appeal to the authorities of
the region to assist with security in support of such encounters. [Ayod suggested as a location, or Atar if
security is a problem.]
10. RECOMMENDATIONS
TO RESOLVE THE TENSIONS BETWEEN THE
LOU NUER AND THE ANYUAK IN AKOBO
Recommended that the (to be
established) regional Peace Council address this issue in the near future. As part of the problem originates from
scarce resources in the Nuer home areas (water/grazing), recommended that these
issues become part of the solution.
Sharing of administrative duties (between Anyuak and Nuer) was also
recommended. [Also noted that hostility
between the two groups in Ethiopia was having an impact in Sudan.]
11. RECOMMENDATIONS
TO BRING ABOUT DIALOGUE WITH THE
PIBOR MURLE
Conference urged, that despite the
lack of contact with the Murle residing in areas controlled by the Khartoum
administration (i.e. in the Pibor area), and the negative profile they have
acquired, that all peaceful options should be considered to establish
communication with the group, in the hope that some positive response might be
achieved.
Recommended that a NSCC send a
message to SCC to spread the word of the people-to-people peace among the Murle
residing in their areas and inform them of what has been achieved so far. Similarly, a delegation from the Murle in
Boma should send a similar message.
12. RECOMMENDATIONS
TO SAFEGUARD THE PEACE PROCESS
FROM POLITICAL
OPPORTUNISM AND TO ENCOURAGE THE
PARTICIPATION OF REMAINING UPPER NILE GROUPS
TO JOIN THE PROCESS
The delegates distinguished
different functions, and how they should be appropriated by the different
parties to the process. Firstly, it is
a people-to-people event, and thus the agenda and initiative must always remain
with the people. Once it has been
agreed when and where a peace meeting will be held, then the civil authorities,
in the company of the traditional leaders, are both responsible for identifying
a suitable location and making preparations for the meeting to take place. Finally, issues of security should remain
with the security forces, in support of the people's peace process.
The conference recommended that the
achievements of Liliir be widely disseminated throughout the region and
documentation be made available in each county/district. The need for continuing smaller, more
localised peace initiatives, was stressed before a larger conference is
convened.